[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Unicode
- From: "Peter Loveday" <peter@...>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:19:43 +1030
> No, we decided that writing the code with all those l_s and l_c macros was
> too heavy, and so they were removed. Our current plans for supporting Unicode
> and w_char is by means of a conversion program.
Yeah, it can certainly make a mess of code having every string in a macro.
So this conversion program, where would I find such a thing ?
Is this something run over the Lua sources that replaces char * / strings with
other types / prefixes ?
The application is already 100% unicode internally (UTF16), using IBM's excellent
(and free) ICU library so I don't need to (and can't) convert that.
Thanks!
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
eyeon Software
----- Original Message -----
From: "Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo" <lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: Unicode
> >I am trying to use Lua in a Unicode application [...]
>
> >> So, lua_char is there for this. Try etc/luser_wchar.h, which defines L_CHAR
> >> to be wchar_t (lua_char is typedef'd as L_CHAR).
> >
> >However this certainly doesn't seem the case in 4.1 work 3. Is this going to
> >be re-introduced?
>
> --lhf
>