[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: Idea: Lua Max, a complete standalone Lua
- From: "Nick Trout" <ntrout@...>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:55:11 -0800
> From: owner-lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br
> [mailto:owner-lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br] On Behalf Of John Belmonte
> Sent: February 10, 2003 2:30 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: Idea: Lua Max, a complete standalone Lua
>
>
> I suggested a similar project one year ago:
>
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2002-02/msg00031.html
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2002-02/msg00126.html
>
I started a framework for it, I called it "Rio", where Lua is from - and
its quick to type ;). The approach I took was:
* Multiple Lua versions should be supported so the directory structure
should reflect this. i.e. current stable version and current working
version.
* Docs are important - I started a simple parser that take wiki style
format and generates HTML.
* Perhaps you should consider the new "premake" project for the build
system.
I could give you what I started (if I can find it at home), it might
supply a few ideas, I'm not saying it's a finished solution (or that
you'll like it :0). It was more an experiment than anything else. It got
left by the wayside though as I ran out of time and Python does
everything I need for a librified scripting language (a lot of this
discussion is probably covered in the links above). It's a lot of work
developing and maintaining libraries like this and they also need to
mature and interact which takes time. Still, I don't want to discourage
you all from doing this project as I might end using it :).
Regards,
Nick