[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Idea: Lua Max, a complete standalone Lua
- From: "Thomas Wrensch" <twrensch@...>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:07:15 -0800
I agree that documentation is probably a serious problem. I can spend at
least some time working on the documentation. At least helping work up
some standards and doing a few example modules.
- Tom
>>> martin@traumwind.de 02/10/03 03:49 AM >>>
>
>
>but one thing that people
>usually forget is documentation. Such distribution should include
>documentation for all the modules included, in an as much as possible
>uniform document.
>
Agreed 100+%... Documentation is - after visibility - one of the great
weaknesses with 'community supplied' extensions. As the people who
created the extensions often don't need any documentation themselves,
this is only natural.
Maybe a standardized form of docuemtation could be the 'barrier of
entry' for inclusion of a module into the distro?
Another one comes to mind, which is terms of licence. A overall Lua
licence might be disireable, but maybe some modules could be included
with explicit statements as to varying licence terms..
-Martin