[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: RE: Pluto updated
- From: benjamin sunshine-hill <bsunshin@...>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:20:00 -0700
Alright. When you're able, I'd like to get your input on how to determine when to invoke an unpersist-lowlevel function. Perhaps a "magic number" gets serialized, nonzero for low-level special persistence, and that number is passed to a user-defined dispatch function?
Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: Grisha <grisha@eagle.ru>
Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:10 pm
Subject: Re: RE: Pluto updated
> Hi, Ben
>
> I understand your concerns with one-step approach (file format & refactoring
> your code), and ofcourse it's only your decision on how to actually do the
> thing. I can't find any better solution than your "__persistlowlevel"
> function if we are using two-step approach, and though I'd prefer to deal
> with as few functions as possible, it will work fine for us.
>
> It's already pretty late here in Moscow, so I'm leaving this discussion till
> tommorrow.
>
> Best Regards,
> Grisha
>
>