|
Also, sometimes it might be nice to build both C and Lua side in the same dll. I've done this -just for fun- for the LuaX serial module. It sort of simplifies maintenance (one module = one file) but I'm not enforcing this by any means. Just trying out.
Once this discussion settles & reaches some common understanding, I'd be delighted to try out a 'standard' linkage method for LuaX. Until then, I'll stick with my own.
-ak ps.Also module placement (file system) issues will arise. I for one have found it hard to match LuaX into the standard Posix /usr tree. It really doesn't devide into include, lib etc. so easily.
26.7.2004 kello 05:08, Edgar Toernig kirjoitti:
To have the possibility to wrap any library with a Lua script is IMHO crucial. But force it? No! Just think about statically linked libraries...