Ah good, another standard for Lua DLL naming for modules,
"LUA+LIB.DLL". Just what the Lua community needs :)
Sorry, I use Philippe Lhoste's VC projects since Lua 4.0, and I am
very comfortable with it. :-(
But you are right, Lua.dll + LuaLib.dll, or Lua+Lib.dll, or even
Lua50dll.dll ( from wxLua distribution), is a mess.
Can be possible to define a "standard distribution" naming ?
People could expect any package to depend of the same DLL's, at least
for testing/evaluation purpose.
Thanks Peter,
Daniel