Re: package.preload...

[duck <duck@...>]

> Sorry to be abstruse duck. DIego answered the question a few hours
> before you asked.

Yeah, I was sorry I asked before the answer came back, because I realised 
as soon as I read my own post (applying English semantics, aka thinking) 
that there is nothing about being a preloaded pacakge which is mutually 
exclusive with being a loaded package. Indeed, it is rather useful to 
be able to tell that a package was preloaded before it was loaded (that
sounds weird, but you know what I mean :-)

I was about to provide an analogy, but it was a sporting one (a type of 
analogy I can barely abide myself) and based upon Australian Football
(which has to be considered abstruse in the extreme on any global mailing
list). So I shan't.