[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaSocket, Win32 and select()
- From: skaller <skaller@...>
- Date: 29 Jan 2005 00:45:50 +1100
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:35, Rici Lake wrote:
> On 27-Jan-05, at 11:54 PM, skaller wrote:
>
> > It makes select() utterly useless. You might was well just
> > attempt to write to each socket in turn (nonblocking write I mean),
> > perhaps with a delay each pass all write fail and you want to
> > politely yield CPU to the OS.
>
> It's an indication of which sockets you don't need to poll.
> It doesn't have to work 100% of the time to be useful. If it
> worked 10% of the time, it probably would be "utterly useless"
> but if, as I suspect is the case, it worked 95% of the time
> or more, it would be "fairly useful".
Well .. I'm forced to admit your iguana has the right answer!
--
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850,
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net
- References:
- LuaSocket, Win32 and select(), duck
- Re: LuaSocket, Win32 and select(), Diego Nehab
- Re: LuaSocket, Win32 and select(), Rici Lake
- Re: LuaSocket, Win32 and select(), Diego Nehab
- Re: LuaSocket, Win32 and select(), Rici Lake
- Re: LuaSocket, Win32 and select(), skaller
- Re: LuaSocket, Win32 and select(), Rici Lake