[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: lua51 instead of lua? (fink, debian, gentoo et.al)
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@...>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:59:30 -0400
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 04:45:00PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> dsilvers@stupor:~$ dpkg -L lua50 lua40 | grep bin/lua
> /usr/bin/lua50
> /usr/bin/luac50
> /usr/bin/lua40
> /usr/bin/luac40
>
> Looks like Debian and Ubuntu put them in there.
The inconsistency is a pain; I have to jump autoconf hoops to find the
right names:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/stepmania/stepmania/autoconf/m4/lua.m4?rev=1.8
with some systems having lua-config by different names, and some not having
it at all, and -config scripts are typically a pain for cross-compiling.
(But those hoops aren't going away, since the inconsistency is already in
the wild.)
--
Glenn Maynard