Re: Implementation of %

[Alain <alainm@...>]

Couldn't we have both as math.mod and math.mod2 well documented and just 
state which one is %?  Of course for compatibility, the old one cannot 
change...

Alain

Adam D. Moss escreveu:
> The % version seems much more correct to me, though
> I'd rather the two implementations were consistant.
> On the other hand changing the behaviour of math.mod
> to be a modulus instead of remainder operation could
> subtly break some old code.  Ho hum.
>
> --adam
> p.s. sieve.lua is around 12% faster with % instead
> of math.mod() :)