Re: Lua 5.1 (beta) now available

[Ben Sunshine-Hill <sneftel@...>]

On 11/20/05, Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> Well, there are other "problems", for instance
> a traversal of a table with NaN will also fail, again because
> it will not be able to find that key to continue the traversal.
> But that does not "break" Lua, it is only a strange behavior for a
> strange situation.

Not being able to find the key again is understandable behavior, I
suppose (although the potential for memory leaks is obvious)... but
traversal failing? I would say that's "broken".

Ben