[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: os.setenv()???
- From: Lisa Parratt <lisa@...>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:16:50 +0000
On 8 Jan 2006, at 22:04, Ryanne Thomas Dolan wrote:
Certainly there are two different paradigms. I just think that a
thin API offers more power and performance, and allows the
community to develop simpler interfaces on top of the standard.
And though you say a high-level abstraction is simpler, I rather
use the functions I already am familiar with than learn a Lua-
specific abstraction that does the same thing.
Interpreted code will *always* be slower than native code. You can
have power (expose the primitives) or performance (wrap function call
sequences in single Lua functions), but I severely doubt you can have
both.
--
Lisa
- References:
- os.setenv()???, Chris Marrin
- Re: os.setenv()???, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: os.setenv()???, David Burgess
- RE: os.setenv()???, Dolan, Ryanne Thomas (UMR-Student)
- Re: os.setenv()???, David Burgess
- Re: os.setenv()???, Diego Nehab
- Re: os.setenv()???, Ryanne Thomas Dolan
- Re: os.setenv()???, David Burgess
- Re: os.setenv()???, Chris Marrin
- Re: os.setenv()???, Rici Lake
- Re: os.setenv()???, Ryanne Thomas Dolan
- Re: os.setenv()???, Rici Lake
- Re: os.setenv()???, Ryanne Thomas Dolan