[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn
- From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@...>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:27:17 -0200
Hallo,
On 25/01/06, mnewberry <mnewberry@mirametrics.com> wrote:
>
> For my part, I am not asking anyone to turn Lua into C/C++. I'm suggesting
> small changes to syntax to make it more consistent with how we already
> think.
And who's we? Lua could be made easier for people coming from
Scheme or APL as well. Or it could stand as it is and people could
actually learn the syntax. It's not that difficult.
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
- References:
- Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Vijay Aswadhati
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Chris Marrin
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Keith Wiles
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Alen Ladavac
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, mnewberry
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Tom Reahard
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Brian Weed
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Walter Cruz
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Ben Sunshine-Hill
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, mnewberry
