[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn
- From: "Michael T. Richter" <ttmrichter@...>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:27:28 +0800
On Thu, 2006-26-01 at 10:14 +0000, Lisa Parratt wrote:
> It always struck me as an exceedingly beautiful way of making all the
> different sorts of loop disappear up themselves.
It is exceedingly beautiful in the languages that have it (or, like
Dylan and its ilk, permit you to make it). Unfortunately it is also
typically fought tooth-and-nail in the ... more staid shops. I've had
people tell me that Eiffel was "ugly" because it didn't have "proper"
for and while loops. (Kind of like people calling Lua ugly because it's
~= instead of !=....)
--
Michael T. Richter
Email: ttmrichter@gmail.com, mtr1966@hotpop.com
MSN: ttmrichter@hotmail.com, mtr1966@hotmail.com; YIM:
michael_richter_1966; AIM: YanJiahua1966; ICQ: 241960658; Jabber:
mtr1966@jabber.cn
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Vijay Aswadhati
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Boyko Bantchev
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Chris Marrin
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Keith Wiles
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Alen Ladavac
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Tom Reahard
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Brian Weed
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Walter Cruz
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Mark Edgar
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Lisa Parratt