[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: luac and import library for dll are not built (mingw)
- From: nusret <nbalci_l@...>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:06:14 -0800 (PST)
By the way, Michael, In an email on the make-w32
mailing list claims that there is no problem for unix
systems in this ';' to '&&' conversion (today). In
fact and according to Paul Smith, the current
maintainer of make, cd <directory> && <whatever
command> is even safer on Unix systems and he claimed
that this won't break anything. I don't know, that's
what he said... Apparently, && does the same thing
everywhere, whereas ';' on Unix-like systems is
exactly like '&' on Windows: even if directory change
fails, the next command tries to execute. At least in
our case, this is neither likely, nor the desired
behavior. In fact if cd fails, we fall into infinite
loop :)
Regards,
Nusret
--- "Michael T. Richter" <ttmrichter@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-13-02 at 19:38 -0800, nusret wrote:
>
> > Thank you Sir.
> > I have a little suggestion: if you change
> > cd src;
> > instances to
> > cd src &&
> > in the makefile(s), one can use the windows native
> > port of make (aka mingw32-make) as well as the
> others.
> > Otherwise one has to use cygwin version or msys
> > version, but mingw32-make fails as cmd.exe takes ;
> as
> > part of a file pathname.
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nusret
>
>
> That, then, would fail under various UNIX
> environments. Not a portable
> solution. Of course writing a
> sed/awk/perl/python/whatever script to
> globally make that change on your computer will
> solve the problem
> nicely. Hell, there's probably something you can do
> with CMD.EXE --
> there's a whole bunch of stuff it can do to files
> that nobody every
> looks at.
>
> --
> Michael T. Richter
> Email: ttmrichter@gmail.com, mtr1966@hotpop.com
> MSN: ttmrichter@hotmail.com, mtr1966@hotmail.com;
> YIM:
> michael_richter_1966; AIM: YanJiahua1966; ICQ:
> 241960658; Jabber:
> mtr1966@jabber.cn
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com