Re: L->ci>top less than L->top? (Lua 5.1)

[Tim Gogolin <tgogolin@...>]

Awesome. That's one less ADOBE_EXTENSIONS ifdef in our code.
The closer we can get to a stock distribution, the happier I am :-)

Thanks for checking that Mike.

-- Tim Gogolin



On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Mike Pall wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Tim Gogolin wrote:
> > I just pulled the RC source for lua 5.1 and the code in
> > luaD_seterrorobj() is the same as it was before; it doesn't appear to
> > have any code similar to Mike's suggestion.
>
> It's now in lua_resume():
>
>   if (status != 0) {  /* error? */
>     L->status = cast_byte(status);  /* mark thread as `dead' */
>     luaD_seterrorobj(L, status, L->top);
>     L->ci->top = L->top;                       <----------
>   }
>
> I've checked all work/rc releases against all issues reported on
> the mailing list. My bug tracker has no open items left (*).
>
> Curious: is anyone else maintaining a private Lua bug tracker?
>
> (*) Wrt. the source. I gave up on reporting doc/* problems.
>
> Bye,
>      Mike