[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: tables
- From: "D Burgess" <dburgess@...>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:39:44 +1100
I think the behaviour is dangerous.
> =#{nil,2}
2
> =#{[2]=2}
0
The behaviour changes depending on the syntax of construction.
David B
On 3/6/06, Dolan, Ryanne Thomas (UMR-Student) <rtdmr6@umr.edu> wrote:
>
> The length operator only guarantees a predictable result in the case of an "array" without holes, like: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}. If there are any holes at all, then you can't rely on the # operator to give you the result you expect. This is why the manual is a bit confusing; it gives a definition that is always valid, but not really useful except in the special case of an array without holes.
>
> So, your experiment with {nil, 2, 3, 4, 5} gives you a valid result (according to the manual's definition) but it isn't a useful value. This is not a bug at all, but an optimization.
>