[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1
- From: "D Burgess" <dburgess@...>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:37:42 +1100
Mike Pall wrote:
> Maybe wait a bit until some other things surface?
Agree.
> > - Ok, we should put something in the manual about that. But WHERE? Where
> > will someone look in the manual if he gets weird behavior? Maybe a
> > "Known (no) Bug" section?
>
> A new FAQ section? Should contain the 'My app crashes when I open
> the io library' problem, too (not lua_call'ed.)
>
A separate document maybe, xxxxxx.html?
> > - Should we add some explicit test in the code, too? Maybe a C assert
> > in luaH_new?
How about some Lua/C verification programs in /etc or /test?
> Another suggestion: resurrect the lua_number2int MSVC asm macro.
> I thought the last iteration of this worked well enough, before
> it was replaced by the portable (but precision sensitive) macro.
> The gcc asm macros always worked fine.
I also preferred this option.
DB
- References:
- Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Kein-Hong Man
- Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Kein-Hong Man
- Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Andreas Stenius
- Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Kein-Hong Man
- Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Andreas Stenius
- Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Kein-Hong Man
- Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Andreas Stenius
- [SOLVED] Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Andreas Stenius
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: and/or missbehaviour in embedded lua 5.1, Mike Pall