|
Mildred skrev: [...]
What do you think ?
I'm not sure I follow what your syntax would expand to... or how you'd like to use it. Can't make sense of it.
[...]
Maybe it could be possible to define ... even outside variadic functions. It would just expand the vararg of the enclosing function.
I agree, I've run across this too. My work-around was to pass the ... to the enclosed function.. //A