Re: question about Unicode

[Doug Rogers <rogers@...>]

Asko Kauppi wrote:
> Anyways, David's idea about allowing all higher codes as identifiers
> sound good.

Add another vote from me. I haven't seen any negative votes so far.

What are the down sides of allowing higher codes in identifiers? The
only one I can think of is accidentally trying to compile binary files.

This should be added to the 5.2 wish list. I'm not sure about the UTF-8
enforcement for source, but my first reaction is positive.

Doug

-- 
--__-__-____------_--_-_-_-___-___-____-_--_-___--____
Doug Rogers - ICI - V:703.893.2007x220 www.innocon.com
-_-_--_------____-_-_-___-_--___-_-___-_-_---_--_-__-_