[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Complete SDL distro?
- From: L-28C <kixdemp@...>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:28:19 -0400
>> It would help if L-28C would describe, what exactly is "not
>> satisfying" about using it. Maybe my contact info in the package is
>> outdated; this is where to reach me currently.
Hmm... I didn't try it, I just assumed it lacked support for it. Sorry
about that, I underestimated your power.
> I think I have given up trying to get a straight answer or story from
> L-28C. I will be less responsive to his postings in the future. :-)
Trying to get a straight answer? What's that supposed to mean? My
answers aren't straight? Please explain.
And as for my name, I don't really like giving my real one out (if
someone wants to look me up for a job, they probably won't hire the
creator of <real name>'s Virus Maker, will they? ;-)). I'll try to take
off all references to it, but thanks for comparing it to SW's robots, it
really makes me feel good. (Not really, but anyway.)
Kein-Hong Man wrote:
Asko Kauppi wrote:
Thanks for the Wise words! :)
LuaX has had SDL_gfx at least for two years or so. No contributions
needed there, as far as I would know.
My mistake, as least, as far as my posting is concerned. :-) I looked in
./Modules but did not look in ./Modules/SDL2 ...
It would help if L-28C would describe, what exactly is "not
satisfying" about using it. Maybe my contact info in the package is
outdated; this is where to reach me currently.
I think I have given up trying to get a straight answer or story from
L-28C. I will be less responsive to his postings in the future. :-)