[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Perhaps USE_LINUX should go away. Was Re: OS X is not (should not be) so different
- From: eugeny gladkih <john@...>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:49:16 +0400
>>>>> "RL" == Rici Lake <lua@ricilake.net> writes:
>> Anyway, it seems that using dlopen in Mac OS X 10.4 is ok. Great.
>> Again, the correct Makefile line for building Lua to use dlopen is
>> $(MAKE) all MYCFLAGS="-DLUA_USE_LINUX" MYLIBS="-lreadline"
>>
>> but perhaps LUA_USE_LINUX is confusing... (LUA_USE_LINUX just means
>> LUA_USE_POSIX, LUA_USE_DLOPEN, and LUA_USE_READLINE).
RL> Apparently not all Linux distros have dlopen(); there was a query
RL> on #lua the other day from someone using linuxppc on an
RL> embedded ARM appliance with no shared object
RL> implementation.
Anyway, all PC's Unixces have dlopen() and they are POSIX
compliant, but a few have readline installed, even so Linux. ;)
I'm afraid LUA_USE_LINUX is meaning nothing
--
Yours sincerely, Eugeny.
Doctor Web, Ltd. http://www.drweb.com
- References:
- RE: NSLINKMODULE_OPTION_PRIVATE a problem? (OS X require of a modulemultiple times), Jerome Vuarand
- Re: NSLINKMODULE_OPTION_PRIVATE a problem? (OS X require of a modulemultiple times), Asko Kauppi
- Re: NSLINKMODULE_OPTION_PRIVATE a problem? (OS X require of a modulemultiple times), Asko Kauppi
- Re: NSLINKMODULE_OPTION_PRIVATE a problem? (OS X require of a modulemultiple times), Gé Weijers
- OS X is not (should not be) so different, Asko Kauppi
- Re: OS X is not (should not be) so different, Sam Roberts
- Re: OS X is not (should not be) so different, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: OS X is not (should not be) so different, Ken Smith
- Re: OS X is not (should not be) so different, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Perhaps USE_LINUX should go away. Was Re: OS X is not (should not be) so different, Rici Lake
