[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Hashing userdata
- From: Matt Campbell <mattcampbell@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:27:55 -0600
OK, are both "key" and "v.key" references to the same Lua userdata?
That is, do they both come from the same invocation of lua_newuserdata?
I'm guessing the answer is no. What you need is a table, probably only
referenced in the Lua registry, which maps C++ pointers (as Lua light
userdata) to the corresponding full userdata. This table should have
weak values; that is, its metatable's "__mode" field should be set to
"v". Then, whenever your C++ code needs to send an object to Lua, it
should first look up the object's pointer (again, as light userdata) in
this cache table. If a corresponding full userdata object is found, the
C++ code should send that to Lua. Otherwise, it should create a new
full userdata object and map that to the C++ pointer in the cache table
before sending it to Lua. Then there will be only one Lua userdata
object for each C++ object.
Matt