Re: [ANN] luaposix-5.1.2 released (lposix fork)

[David Kastrup <dak@...>]

"steve donovan" <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> writes:

> On Jan 30, 2008 3:36 PM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Er, so why not unfork it then?  Forks aren't per-se a bad thing, but
>> ... they do confuse people, split resources, and often lead to subtle
>> problems.  If this fork has no real purpose, it seems a bit silly to
>> keep it around...
>
> But this way, someone will look after it and it will not hang around
> somewhat neglected.

I have to try forking myself at one time.

-- 
David Kastrup