[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: At the edge of LNUM patch
- From: "Ariel Manzur" <puntob@...>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:09:01 -0300
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:49 AM, <askok@dnainternet.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> The reason for LNUM slowing modern x86 is maybe just that
> integer calculations (s.a. simple increment) need to be
> range checked to find out potential falling to FP realm.
This is also why it would be nice to be able to disable such conversions.
- References:
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Asko Kauppi
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Mark Hamburg
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Doug Currie
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Asko Kauppi
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Miles Bader
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Mike Pall
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Bogdan Marinescu
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Asko Kauppi
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, David Kastrup
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, askok
