[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: At the edge of LNUM patch
- From: eugeny gladkih <john@...>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:21:30 +0300
>>>>> "LHdF" == Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> writes:
>> and we'll have problems with math library
LHdF> sure, but the math library is mostly for real numbers, right?
LHdF> do you really want to compute cos of an integer?
no, of course, I wan't :) anyway, we should have possibility not
compiling math library at least. do you agree?
I like LNUM patch, the reason is simple - we need the 64bit
integers for a nice bussines (imagine a money, file size, disks
space, etc.) calculation and the float point numbers for
creating graphs (percent fractions, for example).
LHdF> Or do you mean the libraries as well?
LHdF> what other libraries have such problems?
they don't, AFAIK
--
Yours sincerely, Eugeny.
Doctor Web, Ltd. http://www.drweb.com
+79119997425
- References:
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Miles Bader
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Mike Pall
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Bogdan Marinescu
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Asko Kauppi
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, David Kastrup
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, askok
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Mike Pall
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Doug Rogers
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, eugeny gladkih
- Re: At the edge of LNUM patch, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo