Re: [ANN] Lua For Windows v5.1.3.3 Public Alpha2 released

[Stephen Kellett <lua@...>]

gary ng wrote:
First things first: Your English is fine. Nothing to be concerned about 
there. Far better than my (insert random language here). If anything the 
way this conversation has gone, I've seen the same thing happen with 
native English speakers. So, in a way, thats a compliment that you feel 
comfortable enough with English that you can write in an implicit style 
that will confuse someone given the chance.

> my main concern is, "is it lua5.1.dll"
> why ? because lua5.1.dll doesn't work with
> luainterface
> why do I care about luainterface ?
> because it is cool to have .NET(like ASP.NET)
> integration.

If I'd have written it, I'd probably been explicit about (wanting/not 
wanting) .Net. Your intent in that area is implicit (you know what you 
require, but isn't stated).

Written as it is I think the phrase " because it is cool to have 
.NET(like ASP.NET) integration." means you want/need .Net support. Which 
is unfortunate, as that is the opposite of what you intended.

I can't really see how it can be read any other way, unless you put in 
an explicit statement to the contrary. Hence, mis-communication.

Stephen