On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Ralph Hempel
<rhempel@hempeldesigngroup.com> wrote:
Ah. I'm not using LuaBinaries because I find it difficult to determine
which versions are current. It's a good thing that you've gone ahead
and done the hard part of consolidating the binaries!
So far I've built Lua, luafilesystem, luasocket, and luasql.odbc and
am using them in a small app.
Next, I'll add luaxml and a few other modules. Note that I'm making
my own rockspecs that use the "module" build type, which results
in LuaRocks using its own builtin compiler wrapper instead of
calling make.
I'll post more on this when I'm comfortable with what it's doing.
Why not use Lua for Windows? It is ready to go. We have done all the work already, except LuaRocks.
--
Regards,
Ryan
RJP Computing
