[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: binary file portability?
- From: Rob Kendrick <lua-l@...>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:41:30 +0100
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:11:34 +0400
eugeny gladkih <john@gladkih.com> wrote:
> RK> Making something that can read a generic format, especially when
> RK> you're doing with floating point numbers, is not fun. Doing so
> RK> it's fast is
>
> you can store them in ASCII, like they are in the source.
What about constant simplification? The numbers in a compiled chunk
may not be easily or precisely represented in ASCII. And anyway, at
that point, why bother compiling the chunk at all? Compilation is not
a barrier to keeping your sources secret, nor is it something that will
keep your code smaller (compiling it often makes it larger.) The only
thing it saves you is a (small) amount of time compiling it, and the
possibility to exclude the compiler from your build of Lua in tightly
resource-constrained systems.
B.