Re: property based C++ API with Lunar?

[Michael Bauroth <Michael.Bauroth@...>]

Sorry that I ask: what do you mean with a table? Have you eventually a 
short sample for me? Unfortunately I have to learn Lua, C++ in depth and 
the bridge stuff at the same time.

Best Regards
Micha


Ignacio Burgueño schrieb:
> Michael Bauroth wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have implemented your solution, but had to change two lines because 
> > of a compiler error (VS2008). What do you mean?
> >
> > was ...
> >
> > #define LCB_ADD_SET(fieldname) { #fieldname , set_##fieldname }
> > #define LCB_ADD_GET(fieldname) { #fieldname , get_##fieldname }
> >
> > changed to ...
> >
> > #define LCB_ADD_SET(fieldname) { #fieldname , &set_##fieldname }
> > #define LCB_ADD_GET(fieldname) { #fieldname , &get_##fieldname }
>
> Indeed, I meant to take the address of the function (get_foo, set_foo). 
> It seems that with VC6 it was optional to use & in this case.
>
> > Just another question. What can I change to use the same solution as 
> > well for methods with more than one parameter, e.g. instead of 
> > btn:SetPosition( 1, 1 ) I want to use btn.Position = 1, 1?
>
> I don't think this is possible since the __newindex and __index 
> metamethods don't take multiple values. There was some discussion of the 
> list some time ago about this.
>
> What you might do instead is something like:
> btn.Position = {1,1}
>
> And deal with a table in your C++ implementation.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ignacio