Re: Explicit call of C++ destructors from within Lua (Lunar based)

[Hakki Dogusan <dogusanh@...>]

Hi,

Michael Bauroth wrote:
> Hi Hakki,
>
> I would strongly prefer LuaBind at the moment, because it seems the 
> easiest way to write an LuaBaseClass with an abstract Bind() method, so 
> that each C++ class only needs to implement this method with the needed 
> binding stuff.
>
> WDYT

I didn't use LuaBind, can't comment about it.

I used SWIG (for Python) and toLua (once, for Lua 4.x?) for binding of a 
C++ library. Whenever a new Python version is released, someone asks for 
my binding for it. I re-generate binding with SWIG, compile, upload it 
.. (Funny thing is, I'm not using neither my binding nor target library 
and Python since Python-1.5. Since target library is a commercial 
product, I can't open source my SWIG interface '*.i' files, neither. :) )

Nowadays, I'm using Lunar or manual binding.

But, I always seperate C++ implementation with binding implementation 
for my code. I don't have another option for a foreign library, anyway :)


> Regards
> Micha
>
>
> Hakki Dogusan schrieb:
> > [snip]

--
Regards,
Hakki Dogusan