Re: Possible Bug in bitlib under Windows?

[Mike Pall <mikelu-0812@...>]

Tim Channon wrote:
> Mike Pall wrote:
> > Anyway, here are the specs:
> > - Supported functions: bit.tobit, bit.bnot, bit.band, bit.bor,
> >   bit.bxor, bit.lshift, bit.rshift, bit.arshift, bit.rol, bit.ror.
> > - Only 100 lines of C.
> 
> Licence?

Same as Lua (MIT/X).

--Mike