Re: LuaForge problems

[Keffo <keffo.sandberg@...>]

Indeedly lua would be a much better fit than anything else in terms of 
software, I'd just like to pop in a quick word in favour of 
virtualization, to keep it entirely hw agnostic in the future, whatever 
the software turns out to be..



Asko Kauppi wrote:
> :)  I was mostly thinking of other LuaForge-specific issues, where the 
> software does not seem to be as easily maintainable or customizable as 
> we'd (they'd) want.
>
> I'm sure an equivalent system could be done with a bunch of (existing) 
> Lua tools, s.a. Kepler and/or Lumikki. There's a certain feeling of 
> dejavu. I'm sure we've already discussed this.
>
> As to hardware problems, Lua runs fast and can therefore make 
> duplication cheaper (by two servers).  But we really do need a 
> Lua-centric "home base" s.a. LuaForge has been.
>
> -asko
>
>
> Petite Abeille kirjoitti 5.1.2009 kello 20:58:
>
> > On Jan 5, 2009, at 7:51 PM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
> >
> > > We'll eventually need to replace that software stack with Lua-based 
> > > things.
> >
> > While Lua can do wonder, no doubt, how would it help with an hardware 
> > problem? :D
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > PA.
> > http://alt.textdrive.com/nanoki/