if bit.or(a,b)==0 || bit.and(c,d)==1 && !(bit.not(c)==1) ...
;)
But both examples are contrived anyway... And just because a feature exists, does not mean you have to use it. :) It would be nice to have though, esp if you wanted to redefine these things for a specific "type".
Mike
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@013net.net> wrote:
Mike Panetta wrote:
[...]
This might be a nice feature for the next release...
Not to my taste. I wouldn't like to see the following:
if bit.or(a,b)==0 or bit.and(c,d)==1 and not bit.not(c)==1 ...