Re: string.byte with empty string

[Vaughan McAlley <ockegheim@...>]

> If you're just testing a single character at the start, comparing to
> string.sub(s,1,1) - or s:sub(1,1) - seems like a more obvious route to take.
>
> -Duncan
>

My original intention was to test the string without creating a new
string. Pretty trivial, I know, in the grand scheme of things :-)

Vaughan