[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Re: [ANN] llvm-lua 1.0
- From: "lihuiba" <magazine.lihuiba@...>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:28:32 +0800
>i think that even if LuaJIT beat llvm-lua, it would have a very
>important role because of its portability. it can do either JIT or
>statically compile to ARM
So, how about performance with respect to the
standard Lua VM? And executable size?
I admit that llvm-lua is a greate work, and it makes me interested
in llvm too. So I'm willing to see some more results :-)
------------------
Regards,
Li Huiba
2009-06-03
