[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua next version
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:28:45 +0200
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Cosmin
Apreutesei<cosmin.apreutesei@gmail.com> wrote:
> A standard library of common abstractions would solve all
> problems of course, but I is it possible to build it efficiently
> (either in C or lua) on top of current infrastructure?
The phrase 'standard library' of course made me smile, this being Lua
;) Which is what I would vote for, so that people who are uncertain
or wish to convey their intentions in a very definite way would use
array and map abstractions, not raw tables.
The 't[] = ' notation seems superfluous, since surely #{} must be
sensible and allowd?
steve d.