Re[2]: Coroutines and Go

[Bulat Ziganshin <bulat.ziganshin@...>]

Hello David,

Thursday, November 12, 2009, 7:21:39 PM, you wrote:

> circuits were rockets science. Why am I able to compare a language from
> this era with a contemporary one on an equal basis? Because,
> depressingly, state-of-the-art in programming languages hasn't moved
> much in those 41 years.

and you know Haskell, of course?

algol-68 was too heavy for its times. now, Go is proposed as C
successor, system-level PL, replacing assembler


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com