[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Why nobody talks about Lua
- From: Wesley Smith <wesley.hoke@...>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:45:50 -0800
> Last year I did some experiments with 'Lua for Linux' which avoided
> Debian-specific stuff. It provided a reasonable core set of libraries
> (without SciTE, it was about a Meg) and LuaRocks for extension. At
> the time, the response was 'Well why don't you do this using the
> obviously standard apt-get package manager?'. And the reason I gave
> was that Linux is more than Debian; in fact, Unix is more than LInux,
> so I started thinking about 'Lua for Unix' and got a build going on OS
> X as well.
This is the strategy we take for LuaAV (http://lua-av.mat.ucsb.edu/).
We include an app that can run multiple scripts simultaneously with a
console window and an interactive editor. For dependencies that we
can get reliably from ubuntu, there's a shell script to run apt-get,
otherwise we build it form source.
wes
- References:
- Why nobody talks about Lua, Alex Combas
- Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, dcharno
- Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, Alex Combas
- Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, steve donovan
- Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, Eike Decker
- Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, Stuart P. Bentley
- Re: Why nobody talks about Lua, steve donovan