[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: string:sub
- From: Philippe Lhoste <PhiLho@...>
- Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:46:28 +0100
On 07/03/2010 15:25, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
he said about "Lua's philosophy, not unlike C's one"
That sentence was about "garbage in, garbage out".
When I mentioned crashes and security breaches, I was thinking of C, for
example fprintf, scanf and similar functions.
i think that Lua, unlike C, should be safe. in terms of both: crashes
and security violations
I fully agree there. And I think Lua authors agree too, we have seen
them actively fixing the rare crashes and security warnings that were
reported.
The lack of checking is on parameters that don't make crashes, like
discussed here.
--
Philippe Lhoste
-- (near) Paris -- France
-- http://Phi.Lho.free.fr
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
- References:
- string:sub, David Burgess
- Re: string:sub, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: string:sub, David Burgess
- Re: string:sub, Erik Lindroos
- Re: string:sub, David Burgess
- Re: string:sub, Enrico Colombini
- Re: string:sub, spir
- Re: string:sub, Scott Vokes
- Re: string:sub, joao lobato
- Re: string:sub, Philippe Lhoste
- Re[2]: string:sub, Bulat Ziganshin
- Re: Re[2]: string:sub, Alex Davies
- Re[4]: string:sub, Bulat Ziganshin