Re: Current best practice for C++ exception handling

[Miles Bader <miles@...>]

Gaspard Bucher <gaspard@teti.ch> writes:
> I am writing an automated C++ to Lua binder that uses Doxygen to parse
> the source code. This tool called "Dub" (Doxygen based Ubiquitous
> Binder) has the following advantages over other tools:
>
> * no need to write receipts (it just parses the raw sources)
> * automatic handling of template classes and typedefs
> * handles overloaded functions
> * default value handling
> * enums, constants, etc
> * parse and generate are different steps which makes it easy to create
> bindings for other languages

Hm, does this do a better job of it than swig?

[swig basically offers all those features, but of course, it's not perfect.]

-Miles

-- 
`The suburb is an obsolete and contradictory form of human settlement'