[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Where Tcl and Tk went wrong; {SPAM?} Re: Where Tcl and Tk went wrong
- From: Aleirade <aleirade@...>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:10:56 -0300
--------- Mensagem Original --------
De: Lua list <lua@bazar2.conectiva.com.br>
Para: Lua list <lua@bazar2.conectiva.com.br>
Assunto: Re: Where Tcl and Tk went wrong; {SPAM?} Re: Where Tcl and Tk went
wrong
Data: 31/03/10 12:01
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Alex Queiroz <asandroq@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "Another problem Tcl faced, as it grew, was the tug-of-war between
> > those wishing to see it small, light, and easy to distribute embedded
> > within some other program, and those wishing it to become a
> > "full-fledged" programming language, with lots of tools for solving
> > every day programs. Unfortunately, that tug of war seems to have left
> > it somewhere in the middle."
>
> I think in Lua case we're mostly safe, there's really very few things
> that could reasonably be added to the core language. almost any
> "solving every day programs" need should be done with an external
> library.
>
> --
> Javier
>
>
The loading of external libraries is already a "solving every day programs"
feature...
Andre
________________________________________________________________
Mensagem enviada pelo Microlink Webmail 12.7.8p3