Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (alpha) now available

[Richard Hundt <richardhundt@...>]

On 12/11/2010 05:44 PM, Richard Hundt wrote:
> On 12/11/2010 03:52 PM, steve donovan wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Frank Meier-Dörnberg<frank@md-web.de>
> > wrote:
> > > Sorry, may I'am wrong here and not good informed.
> > > Could please someone, who is better, bring light to me.
> >
> > You are right - one might get #t==3, but luajit might disagree, etc.
> > It is undefined behaviour.
>
> Perhaps. It just doesn't seem that for *this* implementation, it might
> make sense. If I found some inconsistency with string.dump I would also
> report it, despite this function not being supported by LJ 2. Surely?

Of course, I meant: ... It just *does* seem...

Cheers,
Richard