[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break
- From: Dirk Laurie <dpl@...>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:56:45 +0200
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:59:24PM +0200, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
>
> So arrays starting with 1 is just random history, instead of being
> more "natural" the newcomers to coding?
>
Origin 0, origin 1, a matter of taste, not of sophistication.
APL (recently mentioned by Steve Donovan) had a system variable
that allowed you to specify array origin 0 or 1.
Dirk
- References:
- proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, David Manura
- Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Henning Diedrich
- Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Henning Diedrich
- Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Peter Sommerfeld
- Re: proposal: state machine syntax also usable for continue / nested break, Axel Kittenberger
