[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Luajit and curstom data structures
- From: Pierre-Yves Gérardy <pygy79@...>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:17:52 +0200
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 14:10, Francesco Abbate <francesco.bbt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep! As far as I understood this is actually the case, LuaJIT is able
> to optimize FFI calls to the equivalent of compiled C code. For the
> other side Mike exmplained that calling a Lua C function from Lua will
> always have an important overhead that LuaJIT cannot eliminate. This
> is why he was suggesting to use LuaJIT plus FFI calls instead of
> writing Lua C functions.
This may have been asked earlier, but wouldn't it be useful to
translate (at least some of) the standard library into LuaJIT+FFI?
-- Pierre-Yves
- References:
- Luajit and curstom data structures, KR
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Mike Pall
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, KR
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Mike Pall
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Mike Pall
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Francesco Abbate
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Mike Pall
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Francesco Abbate
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Francesco Abbate
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Adam Strzelecki
- Re: Luajit and curstom data structures, Francesco Abbate