Re: [ANN] Updated uFAQ (Unofficial Lua FAQ)

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [ANN] Updated uFAQ (Unofficial Lua FAQ)
From: Enrico Colombini <erix@...>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:46:16 +0200

On 30/08/2011 15.57, Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:

(I also added: "However, several other languages are 0-based without
that influence. Examples include Scheme, Oberon, and Haskell.")

Also, 0-based is the natural choice for people coming from assemblylanguage, accustomed to think in terms of pointers and offsets.


--
  Enrico

References:
- [ANN] Updated uFAQ (Unofficial Lua FAQ), steve donovan
- Re: [ANN] Updated uFAQ (Unofficial Lua FAQ), Axel Kittenberger
- Re: [ANN] Updated uFAQ (Unofficial Lua FAQ), steve donovan
- Re: [ANN] Updated uFAQ (Unofficial Lua FAQ), Dirk Laurie
- Re: [ANN] Updated uFAQ (Unofficial Lua FAQ), Roberto Ierusalimschy

Prev by Date: Re: imbedding and execution
Next by Date: Re: Acceptable indicies
Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] Updated uFAQ (Unofficial Lua FAQ)
Next by thread: Re: [ANN] Updated uFAQ (Unofficial Lua FAQ)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread