[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?
- From: Diego Nehab <diego@...>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:51:16 -0200
> It still surprises me, luasocket's buffering is pretty widely used,
> and its hard to understand it working sporadically. If its true, it
> might bite me some time, which is why I offered to help with it, if I
> can get more info.
This would be news to me too. I'd be interested in more details.
Kind regards,
Diego
- References:
- Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, Sam Roberts
- RE: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, Dean Sellers
- Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, Sam Roberts
- Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, HyperHacker
- Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, Sam Roberts
- Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, Matthew Wild
- Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, Petite Abeille
- Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, Sam Roberts
- Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, HyperHacker
- Re: LuaSocket: No way to protect against fuzzing attacks?, Sam Roberts