[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: modules, require, magic
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:27:12 +0200
2011/10/18 Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com>:
>
> On Oct 18, 2011, at 1:00 AM, troy wreford wrote:
>
>> If you want a language that only adds features for everyone's tastes and
>> never removes features, maybe Lua is not the answer for you.
>
> Nah... lets not blow this out of proportion... Lua is a fine and cheerful language...
>
> Still, some changes are smarter than others. And deprecating module is not in the smart move category.
>
One thing is obvious, and that is: some highly vocal people are
pro-module, other equally vocal people are anti-module.
Another thing should also be obvious, but those very vocal people seem
to regard it as unimportant: if three people agree on whether a
specific change to Lua is smart, their collective opinion matters if
and only if their names happen to be Luiz, Roberto and Waldemar.
- References:
- modules, require, magic, Eduardo Ochs
- Re: modules, require, magic, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: modules, require, magic, Petite Abeille
- Re: modules, require, magic, Sam Roberts
- Re: modules, require, magic, Hisham
- Re: modules, require, magic, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: modules, require, magic, Pierre Chapuis
- Re: modules, require, magic, Petite Abeille
- Re: modules, require, magic, troy wreford
- Re: modules, require, magic, Petite Abeille