Re: Bytecode: Safe or not? / luac manual

[Frank Meier-Dörnberg <frank@...>]

Am 30.10.2011 21:50, schrieb Stefan Reich:
...
> I really do hope that lbcv covers all the possible violations. Having
> a safe way of loading untrusted bytecode is quite crucial to what I
> want to be able to do with Mobile Lua.
...

Do you really have to "load untrusted bytecode"?
Is not it enough or even better to load cryptographically signed bytecode?

Greetings
Frank