|
and there's not much you can do about it.Lua offers me the completely free choice of jumping between OO, functional, AO, DO, or Nambla, at my free will,
which makes it -far- more 'general' to me. On 19/10/2011 02:42 PM, Enrico Colombini wrote:
On 19/10/2011 13.54, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:If Python runs something in 200ms and Lua runs it in 50ms I don't care, it's still a blink of an eye.In a game environment, for example, 1 ms per frame could be way too much. Same thing for memory, in many embedded applications.I fail to understand this drive to "let's change Lua to make it the same as any other generalist language".